By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.
Subscribe to get the latest news, industry trends, blog posts, and updates...
Are you weighing the pros and cons of NetSuite vs SAP for your growing business? Struggling to determine whether SAP or NetSuite better fits your company’s needs? Wondering about the differences between Oracle NetSuite vs SAP S/4HANA as you evaluate ERP options? Looking for the best way to migrate from SAP to NetSuite with minimal disruption?
In this comprehensive NetSuite vs SAP comparison guide, we’ll analyze how these two leading ERP systems stack up against each other in 2025. We’ll examine their core functionalities, contrast their pricing structures, compare their implementation processes, and evaluate their real-world performance to help you make an informed decision for your business.
Whether you’re conducting a NetSuite vs SAP evaluation for a new ERP implementation or exploring SAP to NetSuite migration options, this comparison provides the detailed insights you need to make the right choice for your business’s future.
Imagine this: Your business is growing fast, but your SAP system isn’t keeping up.
First, your finance team spends three weeks just combining data from different subsidiaries. Your IT folks are constantly fixing broken connections between SAP modules. And your sales team? They’re frustrated because they can’t see if products are in stock without logging into a completely different system.
Six months later, it gets worse. After adding just one more business unit, your month-end close now takes almost a month itself. Your accountants are working weekends, and you’ve had to hire someone whose only job is managing your SAP system.
A year later, you’re going international. Now you’re dealing with different currencies and your finance team is drowning in spreadsheets, manually combining numbers from all your separate SAP systems.
By this point, you’re in real trouble. Your data is scattered everywhere. Financial reports are weeks late. Your executives are making major decisions using outdated information.
All because your ERP system couldn’t grow with your business.
The ripple effects are serious:
Bottom line: A system that can’t scale becomes an expensive bottleneck for your entire business

Companies rarely see it coming – how fast they’ll reach the limits of pieced-together ERP systems like SAP:
Here’s the painful truth: Every month you stick with a fragmented system, these problems get more expensive and harder to fix.
But it doesn’t have to be this way. There is a better solution.

Before diving into features, it’s crucial to understand the fundamental difference between these platforms:
| NetSuite | SAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Business Approach | Built as a complete business management system | Multiple products for different market segments |
| Product Strategy | One unified platform for all departments | Three different midmarket ERPs (S/4HANA Cloud, Business One, Business ByDesign) |
| Architecture | “Suite” approach with all modules sharing one database | Products built on different codebases requiring integrations |
| History | Founded in 1998 by Evan Goldberg and Larry Ellison | Founded in 1972 by five former IBM employees |
| Cloud Strategy | Cloud-native from inception | Products shifted to cloud rather than rebuilt for cloud |
| Customer Base | 41,000+ customers across 217 countries | Fragmented across multiple products |
| Long-term Focus | Consistent commitment to one platform | History of reducing investment and sunsetting products |
This philosophical difference impacts everything about these systems – from capabilities to scalability to long-term value.
SAP S/4HANA Cloud, Public Edition is SAP’s attempt to serve the midmarket with a cloud version of its enterprise solution. Let’s see how it compares with NetSuite:
| Feature | NetSuite | SAP S/4HANA Cloud, Public Edition |
|---|---|---|
| General Ledger | Robust GL with unlimited segments | Solid GL capabilities |
| Financial Consolidation | Built in, real-time across entities | Group Reporting tool based on legacy technology |
| Multi-entity Support | OneWorld for seamless multi-entity management | Supported but more complex |
| Revenue Recognition | Comprehensive, ASC 606 compliant | Available but may require additional applications |
| Multi-currency | 190+ currencies with automated exchange rates | Supported but may require customization |
| Intercompany Transactions | Automated intercompany processes | May require additional applications |
| Fixed Assets | Native functionality with automated depreciation | Supported but less integrated |
| CRM Integration | Built-in CRM on same platform | Requires integration with separate CRM product |
| Analytics | SuiteAnalytics with real-time dashboards | Requires separate SAP Analytics Cloud |
NetSuite provides a more unified financial management solution with all capabilities in one system, while S/4HANA Cloud often requires additional applications or integration with other SAP products.
S/4HANA Cloud, Public Edition has significant architectural limitations compared to NetSuite:
In contrast, NetSuite’s cloud-native architecture offers:
Customizing S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition is significantly more restrictive than NetSuite:
| Customization Aspect | NetSuite | S/4HANA Cloud, Public Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Configuration Tools | Business user-friendly SuiteBuilder | Self-Service Configuration User Interface (SSCUI) |
| Extension Platform | Comprehensive SuiteCloud platform | Business Technology Platform (BTP) requiring partner development |
| API Access | Open API approach with extensive documentation | Limited to SAP-approved APIs |
| Application Ecosystem | 650+ pre-built SuiteApps | Fewer than 200 compatible apps |
| Custom Field Addition | Employee can add in 10-15 minutes | Partner takes 2-3 weeks at significant cost |
| Industry Solutions | 20+ industry-specific packages | More limited industry configurations |
The real-world impact: A simple change that takes minutes in NetSuite could take weeks and thousands of dollars with S/4HANA Cloud.
SAP recently launched “Grow with SAP” to target midmarket companies with S/4HANA Cloud, Public Edition. Here’s how it compares to NetSuite’s proven SuiteSuccess methodology:
| Implementation Aspect | NetSuite SuiteSuccess | Grow with SAP |
|---|---|---|
| Target Market | Companies from startup to enterprise | Companies with $100M to $1B revenue |
| Industry Specificity | 20+ industry-specific configurations | Limited industry specificity |
| Implementation Timeline | Typical go-live in 100 days | “Technical go-live” in 4-6 weeks (limited functionality) |
| Track Record | Thousands of successful implementations | New program with few references |
| Platform Flexibility | Built-in flexibility for specific needs | Rigid platform with limited customization |
| Implementation Approach | Fixed-price with predictable outcomes | Fixed-rate but uncertain total cost |
| Live Customers | 41,000+ NetSuite customers | Only thousands of S/4HANA Cloud, Public Edition customers |
“Grow with SAP” is essentially a marketing wrapper around the same S/4HANA Cloud, Public Edition product with all its inherent limitations.

SAP Business One is SAP’s small business ERP solution with a 20+ year history. Here’s how it compares to NetSuite:
| Financial Feature | NetSuite | SAP Business One |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Consolidation | Built-in, automatic | No native support, requires add-ons |
| Multi-entity Management | OneWorld handles unlimited entities | Separate database for each entity |
| User Experience | Single login across all entities | Users must log in/out between entities |
| Transaction Management | Full transaction editing capabilities | Cannot edit/remove posted transactions |
| Fixed Asset Management | Automated depreciation | No automated depreciation |
| Financial Reporting | Unified reporting across all data | Multiple reporting tools, often requiring partner setup |
| Real-time Analytics | Built-in SuiteAnalytics | Limited real-time capabilities |
These limitations create significant challenges for growing businesses, especially those with multiple entities or international operations.
SAP Business One’s architecture creates several critical disadvantages compared to NetSuite:
NetSuite’s true cloud architecture eliminates these issues with a single, unified platform that receives automatic updates twice yearly.
Business One creates significant integration challenges:
NetSuite’s unified platform eliminates these integration challenges by providing all core functionality in a single system with a consistent data model.
Customizing Business One is significantly more expensive and complex than NetSuite:
One developer described customizing Business One as “an order of magnitude harder than NetSuite” – a sentiment echoed by many who have used both systems.
SAP Business ByDesign is SAP’s cloud-only SaaS product for midmarket companies. However, SAP recently announced that as of April 2023, ByDesign will receive only “legally required and critical security updates,” effectively putting it in maintenance mode.
ByDesign has had a troubled history:
This creates an untenable situation for ByDesign customers who now face an inevitable forced migration to another system.
Despite being SAP’s closest equivalent to NetSuite architecturally, ByDesign has significant limitations:
| Feature Area | NetSuite | SAP Business ByDesign |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Consolidation | Native, real-time | Limited capabilities |
| Revenue Recognition | Comprehensive, multi-standard | Limited, struggles with multiple standards |
| Budgeting Capabilities | Native planning and budgeting | Limited, often requires separate BPC license |
| Integration Framework | Unified platform with robust APIs | Requires SAP Integration Suite middleware |
| Customization | Extensive business user tools | Limited flexibility, standardized processes |
| Workflow Automation | Visual SuiteFlow tool | Non-visual tool with limited capabilities |
| Development Path | Active development and enhancement | Maintenance mode with no new functionality |
For ByDesign customers, migration to NetSuite provides a clear path forward with a more capable platform and long-term stability.
The implementation experience differs dramatically between SAP and NetSuite:
SAP relies heavily on partners for implementation, creating several risks:
NetSuite takes a fundamentally different approach:
The result is a more predictable, faster implementation with greater chances of success.

| Implementation Aspect | NetSuite | S/4HANA Cloud | Business One | Business ByDesign |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Typical Timeline | 100 days | 6-12 months | 4-6 months | 3-5 months |
| Pricing Model | Fixed price | Mix of fixed and T&M | Time and materials | Time and materials |
| Industry Configuration | 20+ industry editions | Limited industry focus | Generic setup | Limited industry options |
| Implementation Lead | NetSuite + partners | Primarily partners | Exclusively partners | Exclusively partners |
| Partner Experience | Deep NetSuite expertise | Limited S/4HANA Cloud experience | Varies widely | Shrinking partner pool |
| Go-live Support | Comprehensive | Varies by partner | Varies by partner | Varies by partner |
The quality and consistency of support is a critical differentiator between NetSuite and SAP:
SAP’s support model varies by product but generally relies heavily on partners:
NetSuite provides a consistently high level of support directly to customers:
This direct support model eliminates the uncertainty and variability inherent in partner-dependent support models.
Understanding the true cost differences between NetSuite and SAP requires looking beyond initial license prices to evaluate the total cost of ownership over 3-5 years.
SAP’s pricing structure includes many hidden costs that significantly increase TCO:
NetSuite offers a more transparent and predictable cost structure:
For many businesses, NetSuite’s higher initial investment delivers substantially lower total cost of ownership over a 3-5 year period once these factors are considered. This is particularly true for growing businesses that would need to add entities, users, or functionality to their SAP systems over time.
| Cost Factor | NetSuite | SAP Business One |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Cloud | On-Premise/Cloud/Hybrid |
| Subscription Model | Yes | No (Perpetual License Available) |
| Initial Investment | Lower (No large capital expense) | Varies (Dependent on deployment type) |
| Recurring Costs | Inclusive (Updates & Maintenance) | Additional (Maintenance & Upgrades) |
| Scalability Costs | Linear with growth | Often exponential with growth |
| Entity Licensing | Included in OneWorld | Additional licenses per entity |
| Integration Costs | Minimal (unified platform) | Significant (multiple systems) |
| Upgrade Expenses | Included in subscription | Additional projects and partner fees |
| IT Resource Requirements | Minimal | Substantial (specialized expertise) |
| Implementation Pricing | Fixed-price options | Typically time and materials |
| Customization Tools | Included | Often additional licensing |
Growing Multi-entity Business:
International Expansion:
Acquisition Scenario:
By considering these long-term cost factors, businesses can make a more informed decision about the true total cost of ownership between NetSuite and SAP solutions.
Let’s examine how NetSuite and SAP compare across key functional areas:
| Financial Feature | NetSuite | SAP S/4HANA Cloud | SAP Business One | SAP Business ByDesign |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Ledger | Advanced with unlimited segments | Solid GL capabilities | Basic GL functionality | Decent GL structure |
| Consolidation | Real-time, native | Group Reporting tool (legacy tech) | No native support | Limited capabilities |
| Multi-entity | OneWorld for seamless management | Supported but complex | Separate databases required | Limited support |
| Revenue Recognition | Comprehensive, multi-standard | Available but may require add-ons | Basic functionality | Limited functionality |
| Cash Management | Advanced forecasting and management | Good capabilities | Basic functionality | Decent capabilities |
| Fixed Assets | Automated depreciation and management | Supported but less integrated | No automated depreciation | Basic functionality |
| Tax Compliance | Built-in for 100+ countries | Varies by country | Limited international capabilities | Limited compliance |
| Dimensional Reporting | Advanced segments and classifications | Available but less flexible | Limited dimensions | Dimensional structure |
| Intercompany | Automated transactions and eliminations | Available but may require add-ons | Limited to no capability | Basic capability |
| Supply Chain Feature | NetSuite | SAP S/4HANA Cloud | SAP Business One | SAP Business ByDesign |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inventory Management | Advanced multi-location | Good capabilities | Basic inventory | Basic inventory |
| Order Management | Complete order-to-cash | Requires integration with other modules | Basic functionality | Basic functionality |
| Procurement | Full procure-to-pay | May require Ariba integration | Basic purchasing | Basic procurement |
| Demand Planning | Advanced forecasting and planning | Limited in cloud edition | Limited capability | Limited capability |
| Warehouse Management | Native WMS capabilities | Requires separate WMS solution | No native WMS | No native WMS |
| Manufacturing | Production planning and execution | Limited in cloud edition | Basic manufacturing | Limited manufacturing |
| Supply Chain Visibility | End-to-end visibility | Fragmented across modules | Limited visibility | Basic visibility |
| Lot/Serial Tracking | Comprehensive tracking | Available but less integrated | Basic tracking | Basic tracking |
| Multi-location Control | Advanced management | Available but complex | Basic multi-location | Basic multi-location |
| CRM Feature | NetSuite | SAP S/4HANA Cloud | SAP Business One | SAP Business ByDesign |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer Records | Unified across platform | Requires integration with CRM | Basic customer management | Basic customer management |
| Sales Force Automation | Complete SFA functionality | Requires integration | Basic functionality | Basic functionality |
| Marketing Automation | Campaign management | Requires separate solution | Very limited capability | Very limited capability |
| Service Management | Case management and support | Requires separate solution | Basic service functionality | Basic service functionality |
| Customer Portal | Self-service capabilities | Requires separate solution | No native capability | No native capability |
| Unified Customer View | 360-degree customer visibility | Fragmented across systems | Limited visibility | Limited visibility |
| Opportunity Management | Comprehensive | Requires integration | Basic functionality | Basic functionality |
| Commission Management | Native functionality | Requires customization | Limited capability | Limited capability |
| Reporting Feature | NetSuite | SAP S/4HANA Cloud | SAP Business One | SAP Business ByDesign |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real-time Dashboards | Comprehensive, role-based | Requires SAP Analytics Cloud | Multiple tools required | Basic dashboards |
| Self-service Reporting | SuiteAnalytics Workbook | Limited without Analytics Cloud | Partner-dependent | Basic reporting |
| Cross-functional Analysis | Unified data across all areas | Limited across modules | Very limited | Limited |
| KPI Monitoring | Extensive KPI library | Basic KPIs | Limited KPIs | Basic KPIs |
| Drill-down Capabilities | Comprehensive drill-to-detail | Limited without Analytics Cloud | Limited capability | Basic drill-down |
| Mobile Analytics | Native mobile access | Limited mobile analytics | Very limited mobile | Limited mobile |
| Predictive Analytics | Basic capabilities | Requires separate solutions | Not available | Not available |
| Report Scheduling | Comprehensive scheduling | Limited capabilities | Basic scheduling | Basic scheduling |
The daily experience of using these systems varies significantly:
NetSuite provides a unified, consistent user experience:
SAP’s user experience varies by product and often creates challenges:
S/4HANA Cloud:
Business One:
Business ByDesign:
NetSuite’s unified user experience increases adoption rates and productivity by providing a consistent, intuitive interface across all functions.
For companies operating globally or planning international expansion, the differences are particularly significant:
S/4HANA Cloud:
Business One:
Business ByDesign:
NetSuite’s comprehensive global capabilities make it the clear choice for international businesses or those planning global expansion.
The ability to adapt your ERP to specific business needs is a critical success factor:
NetSuite provides comprehensive customization tools accessible to business users:
S/4HANA Cloud, Public Edition:
Business One:
Business ByDesign:
NetSuite’s approach empowers business users to make many customizations themselves, reducing dependence on consultants and accelerating adaptation to changing business needs.
For businesses currently using SAP, migrating to NetSuite offers significant advantages. Here’s Folio3’s proven methodology for SAP to NetSuite migrations:
This structured approach ensures a successful migration with minimal disruption to your business operations.

Here are specific ways NetSuite addresses common limitations that cause businesses to outgrow SAP:
SAP Challenge: Multiple products with different architectures requiring complex integrations.
NetSuite Solution: One unified platform with all modules sharing a single database, eliminating integration headaches.
SAP Challenge: Business One requires separate databases for each entity, with users logging in and out between them.
NetSuite Solution: OneWorld provides seamless management of unlimited entities with a single login and real-time consolidation.
SAP Challenge: Restricted language support, complex multi-country setups, and manual consolidation processes.
NetSuite Solution: Built-in support for 27+ languages, 190+ currencies, and tax compliance for 100+ countries enables seamless global operations.
SAP Challenge: Partner dependence for even simple customizations, with high costs and long timelines.
NetSuite Solution: Business users can handle many customizations themselves with intuitive tools, reducing costs and accelerating changes.
SAP Challenge: Multiple reporting tools, fragmented data, and limited cross-functional visibility.
NetSuite Solution: SuiteAnalytics provides real-time reporting across all business functions with powerful drill-down capabilities.
SAP Challenge: Manual updates requiring partner assistance, with customizations often broken during upgrades.
NetSuite Solution: Automatic biannual updates with all customizations preserved, eliminating upgrade projects and maintaining system currency.
SAP Challenge: Complete reliance on partners of varying quality for implementation, customization, and support.
NetSuite Solution: Direct vendor involvement throughout implementation and support, ensuring consistent quality and accountability.

After helping hundreds of businesses implement NetSuite, here’s our guidance on which system fits which business profile:
SAP’s decision to put it in maintenance mode should tell you everything you need to know about your future. It’s time to start planning your migration strategy.
| Feature | Oracle NetSuite | SAP S/4HANA Cloud, Public Edition |
|---|---|---|
| True Cloud With Strong Cloud Heritage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Unified Platform | ✓ | ✗ |
| Native Financial Consolidation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Out-of-the-Box Leading Practices | ✓ | * |
| Direct Vendor Relationship | ✓ | * |
| Easy to Customize | ✓ | ✗ |
| Ability to Scale | ✓ | ✓ |
| Feature | Oracle NetSuite | |
|---|---|---|
| True Cloud With Strong Cloud Heritage | ✓ | ✗ |
| Unified Platform | ✓ | * |
| Native Financial Consolidation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Out-of-the-Box Leading Practices | ✓ | ✗ |
| Direct Vendor Relationship | ✓ | ✗ |
| Easy to Extend | ✓ | ✗ |
| Ability to Scale | ✓ | * |
| Feature | Oracle NetSuite | SAP Business ByDesign |
|---|---|---|
| True Cloud With Strong Cloud Heritage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Unified Platform | ✓ | * |
| Native Financial Consolidation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Out-of-the-Box Leading Practices | ✓ | * |
| Direct Vendor Relationship | ✓ | ✗ |
| Easy to Extend | ✓ | ✗ |
| Ability to Scale | ✓ | ✓ |
| Product Future Viability | ✓ | ✗ |
Legend:
Q: Is NetSuite more expensive than SAP?
A: Initially, NetSuite may have a higher starting price than some SAP products like Business One. However, when you factor in the additional costs for SAP including entity licenses, integration development, middleware, partner fees, and additional modules, NetSuite often provides better value over a 3-5 year period, especially for growing businesses.
Q: Which system is easier to implement?
A: NetSuite’s SuiteSuccess methodology provides a more structured, predictable implementation approach with typical go-live in 100 days. SAP implementations rely heavily on partners, with timelines ranging from 3-12 months depending on the product and complexity. NetSuite’s industry-specific configurations and fixed-price implementations reduce risk and accelerate time-to-value.
Q: Can I start with SAP Business One and switch to S/4HANA later?
A: Yes, but it would essentially be a complete system replacement. There is no upgrade path from Business One to S/4HANA, requiring a full reimplementation with all the associated costs and disruption. Starting with a platform that can scale with your business avoids this future pain.
Q: How does NetSuite compare to SAP for manufacturing companies?
A: NetSuite provides robust manufacturing capabilities including production planning, BOM management, work order processing, and shop floor control. S/4HANA offers strong manufacturing capabilities but with limited functionality in the cloud edition. Business One has basic manufacturing that quickly becomes limiting for complex operations. For most midmarket manufacturers, NetSuite offers the best balance of functionality and usability.
Q: Which is better for multi-entity businesses, NetSuite or SAP?
A: NetSuite OneWorld is far superior for multi-entity businesses. It provides seamless management of unlimited subsidiaries with a single login, real-time financial consolidation, automated intercompany transactions, and unified reporting. Business One requires separate databases for each entity with users logging in and out between them. S/4HANA has multi-entity support but with greater complexity and often requiring additional products.
Q: Does NetSuite require more IT resources than SAP?
A: No. NetSuite’s cloud platform typically requires fewer IT resources than any SAP product. There’s no infrastructure to manage, no upgrades to implement, and many customizations can be handled by business users rather than IT. SAP products generally require more specialized expertise for management, customization, and upgrades.
Q: How long does data migration from SAP to NetSuite typically take?
A: With Folio3’s proven migration methodology, the data migration process typically takes 4-6 weeks, depending on data volume and complexity. Our approach includes thorough data mapping, validation, and testing to ensure accuracy before go-live.
Q: Can NetSuite handle the same transaction volumes as SAP?
A: Yes. NetSuite is designed to handle high transaction volumes and supports businesses processing millions of transactions. The platform scales efficiently to meet growing transaction needs without performance degradation. For the vast majority of midmarket businesses, NetSuite’s performance capabilities exceed their requirements.
Q: What happens to my SAP customizations when migrating to NetSuite?
A: During the migration process, we analyze your SAP customizations to determine which ones add business value and how to implement equivalent or improved functionality in NetSuite. Some customizations may be unnecessary in NetSuite due to its native capabilities, while others can be reimplemented using NetSuite’s SuiteCloud platform. The goal is to preserve valuable business processes while enhancing them with NetSuite’s more flexible and maintainable customization framework.
Q: How does NetSuite’s reporting compare to SAP Analytics Cloud?
A: NetSuite’s SuiteAnalytics provides robust reporting capabilities unified within the core platform. While SAP Analytics Cloud offers powerful BI functionality, it requires separate licensing, implementation, and integration with your SAP ERP data. NetSuite’s approach provides real-time reporting across all business functions without the need for data extraction or separate tools, resulting in faster insights and lower total cost.
When migrating from SAP to NetSuite, or implementing NetSuite as your first ERP, Folio3 provides advantages that ensure your success:
Our team understands the specific challenges of transitioning from SAP systems and can guide you through the process with minimal disruption to your business operations.

When evaluating NetSuite and SAP, consider both your current needs and your future growth trajectory. The right ERP decision today should serve your business for 5-10 years without forcing a reimplementation as you grow.
NetSuite offers a unified, cloud-native platform with consistent innovation and a proven track record of supporting businesses from startup through enterprise stages. Its integrated architecture eliminates the need for complex integrations between modules, while its SuiteSuccess implementation methodology accelerates time-to-value with industry-specific configurations.
SAP provides multiple ERP options targeting different market segments, with S/4HANA representing its strategic platform for the future. However, SAP’s midmarket strategy shows volatility, as evidenced by the scaling back of Business ByDesign and the uncertain long-term future of Business One. SAP implementations typically involve greater partner dependency, longer timelines, and more complex integration requirements.
For midmarket organizations seeking a comprehensive, scalable cloud ERP solution with predictable costs and rapid implementation, NetSuite typically offers advantages in terms of unified functionality, business user empowerment, and long-term stability. Its strong financial capabilities, combined with operational flexibility, support growth without system replacement, while its cloud architecture eliminates IT infrastructure burden.

If you want a modern, unified system that grows with your business without requiring an IT department the size of Texas, NetSuite is the clear winner for most midmarket companies. Its focus on a single, coherent platform delivers what most businesses need without the integration nightmares and consultant dependency that SAP often creates.
If you’re either very small with simple needs (maybe Business One) or a massive enterprise with specialized requirements (S/4HANA), SAP might make sense—just be prepared for the complexity, cost, and consultant relationships that come with it.
Next Steps: Explore NetSuite with Folio3
Ready to explore whether moving from SAP to NetSuite is right for your business? Take the first step toward transforming your business operations:
By submitting the form you agree to terms & condition and privacy policy of Folio3